tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6734155913806610254.post7867839290469621874..comments2023-09-27T11:52:03.758+01:00Comments on Dr Gordy: A procurement puzzle for the weekend - What is procurement best practice?Dr Gordyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09585184401806267243noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6734155913806610254.post-23506377259511122662015-12-07T13:11:53.821+00:002015-12-07T13:11:53.821+00:00Thanks Nick, yes, I tried to identify the challeng...Thanks Nick, yes, I tried to identify the challenge of recruitment through "Global TNA (Training Needs Analysis) and Skills Development Plans - my preference would be that a 'best practice team' has succession plans too. <br />The discussion about structure and ROI really depends on what the team's remit is - I tend toward a CLAN model but I can understand why, depending on the particularly organisation's needs a centralised or decentralised approach, at a particular period of development. may be more appropriate - that being the case, generalising on the '6X metric' would be misleading, indeed perhaps it falls significantly short! Dr Gordyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09585184401806267243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6734155913806610254.post-68339792985130957692015-12-07T12:55:58.392+00:002015-12-07T12:55:58.392+00:00Very comprehensive list and impressively put toget...Very comprehensive list and impressively put together. One thing I've noted as being absent is around the challenge of recruitment. In the same vein as the point around 'right mix' of procurement outsourcing, there's also the case of 'right mix' of in-house skills and establishing the optimal size/blend of the team. I've heard the metric of having an ROI that is 6x the cost of the procurement team, be interesting to hear how others consider the optimal team structure and recruitment approach.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16077916051610314699noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6734155913806610254.post-35547596251099463932015-11-21T09:51:37.861+00:002015-11-21T09:51:37.861+00:00Thanks for the comment and contributing to the dis...Thanks for the comment and contributing to the discussion. I agree with you. I think we are talking about Leadership ownership and commitment, honesty of current position, smart selection of what would be appropriate and realistic 'better positions', then commitment and capability to make the change. Wanting to become "the best practice" could actually lead to inappropriate practice chasing while aiming for "what's best for us" would be clever strategy. Dr Gordyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09585184401806267243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6734155913806610254.post-14927686498580895752015-11-21T08:48:06.067+00:002015-11-21T08:48:06.067+00:00This comment probably isn't going to name the ...This comment probably isn't going to name the missing 'best practice' but, in my experience, the missing ingredient in most organisations I come across is 'intention'. Intention to genuinely transform company-wide procurement practice. Leaders just don't aim high enough. <br /><br />Instead, they equate P2P systems with transformation, regular supplier meetings with SRM, exhortations of partnering with real supplier innovation processes, etc. It's like they pick up a menu of good procurement ideas, and then select the ones that 'might work', delivering no coherent strategy or plan. Then they wonder why their not-quite-joined-up activities fail to deliver any sort of transformation.<br /><br />Mixing it up a bit here, but as a summary.... no coherent strategy, lack of deep thinking about what will work in their specific circumstances, and insufficient intention to make it happen. David Atkinsonhttp://ww.fourpillars.conoreply@blogger.com