Over the last few weeks I have discussed the need for supplier engagement in implementing a S2P. In this, the last post, I draw together the main points.
Effective
S2P implementation cannot be viewed as something which the implementation
organisation has ultimate control over, as it relies on the supply market also
choosing to own the solution too. Implementers of S2P solutions need to
understand that implementation is a boundary spanning challenge and can
represent major change to suppliers.
Since
S2P implementation is a change initiative, ensure it is used as a opportunity
to contribute to wider strategic objectives, for example, responsible
procurement and supplier rationalisation.
The lack
of supplier engagement and ownership represents one of the greatest risks to any
S2P implementation and requires significant management. Supplier engagement
also needs to start early in the implementation – waiting until ‘go live’ is a
serious under-estimation of the work required.
Successful
implementation is dependent on creating a solid foundation, which includes
budget allocation for supplier engagement and the designation of an empathic
champion.
While
there are many approaches to supplier profiling a simplistic approach,
profiling suppliers as either ‘Users’, ‘Converts’, ‘Willing Novices’ and ‘LateAdopters’ can prove to be just as effective and fits well with the
communications and training and skills development plans.
Suppliers
will be faced with new training and skills development needs. These shortfalls
will impact on the implementing organisation and can be reduced through the useof a Skills Framework, a Training Needs Analysis, and agreeing who hasresponsibility of the specific elements of training and development.
No comments:
Post a Comment